Provider-Exclusive: “There is only the app of my provider.”

Provider-Centric: “There exist other apps, but the one I’m using is the main one.”

Service-Centric: “There is no main one and I’m trying to use the one that fits my ideal the best.”

Protocol/Ecosystem-Centric: “There exist other protocols/ecosystems, but mine is the main one.”

Fediverse-Principle: “There is no main one and I’m trying to use the one that fits my idea of an open ecosystem the best.”

Current state of different web2 apps:

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I’m no graphic designer but the fediverse logo looks like a nightmare to render at small sizes, which is what designers are looking for in a logo, typically - something that is easy to recognize, tells something about the product, and scales well at all sizes, from favicon to building sized ad. I like that it conveys its own meaning really well, but it’s also extremely busy. So many crossing lines in such a small space just looks like a garbled mess at small sizes. Take this image and scale it down to 16x16px, you can see what I mean.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why’d mastodon, lemmy, pixelfed, and friends disappear in the last frame? They’ll remain distinguishable even after fedi takes over the universe. It’s the others that will be obsolete.

    • blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think that this will ever really be the case. Even if ActivityPub became public standard, there would always be other protocolls and different extensions/versions of ActivityPub. And that’s good, because only then can ActivityPub continue to develop, if we have an abstract idea to compare it to. And that’s the Fediverse for me.