Or songs off the Taylor Swift album
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•i am currently going through a lot. what can i do to keep my sanity and not become depressed?3·5 months agoThe chat gpt thing deserves a warning. A data breach could lead to an abuser or employer getting information that they can use against you.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Are there any common household items or products that you think are designed incredibly poorly?2·5 months agoOr if you must use the cap, just drop the cap with the detergent in with the laundry. It will clean itself.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Linux@lemmy.ml•Can we please, PLEASE for gods sake just all agree that arch is not and will never be a good beginner distro no matter how many times you fork it?5·5 months agoYep, as long as Valve keeps it up to date and as long as newbie users don’t figure out what Sudo does it will be fine for them.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Fediverse@lemmy.world•hexbear.net comically loses its domain nameEnglish5·5 months agoYeah, you have no idea what you’re talking about. Go listen to some people that don’t use PragerU talking points.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Fediverse@lemmy.world•hexbear.net comically loses its domain nameEnglish2·5 months agoArguing terminology is not really that helpful here, nazis called themselves socialists. And very few countries with “democratic republic of” in their name are democratic republics.
The terms Socialism and Communism have been used interchangeably since the beginning. This move to split socialism off is both a move by some within the movement to be more palatable to liberals and a move by opposition from without to further factionalize the movement. However, many people use the terms interchangeably or use communism to differentiate themselves from capitalist liberals claiming to be socialists.
Specific subsets of communism/socialism like Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism, vanguard theory and various other implementations of communism are violent, should be criticized and learned from.
All this is to say plenty of people claiming to be communists do not want widespread suffering or genocide. They may be willing to use force to implement their ideas, but so are the adherents of nearly every other ideology.
Nazis always want racial segregation and the of Jews. Communists want equity. Nazis want superiority.
What you are focused on is Vanguard Communism which proposes that because the workers are not yet educated enough to understand that communism is better for them, a group of communists should make a totalitarian government. That totalitarian government will then shepherd the country to total communism.
History shows that this form of communism generally falls to corruption and they never get to full on communism. The proponents of this view always blame outside influences (like the west), while conveniently ignoring that power corrupts everyone.
Cuba is often shown as an example of successful vanguard communism. However it still hasn’t fully divested the communist party of its totalitarian power, and a lot of migrants move to Florida. So, it doesn’t really meet the criteria in my eyes.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Fediverse@lemmy.world•hexbear.net comically loses its domain nameEnglish4·5 months agoWhoever told you that had an agenda.
First, communism is an economic theory. A very stripped down version of the theory is this: It proposes that the rich have obtained their wealth through the exploitation of workers. They justify the exploitation by “owning” the raw materials, tools, factories, land, and other apparatuses that the workers need to produce things. But without workers those things could not be converted or used to convert raw materials into goods. The theory suggests that the workers should own those things instead of the rich people. The idea is that the workers would then share amongst each other because, being of the same class, they are naturally more likely to care about the needs of the others in that class. Whatever your opinion or critique of this general idea, it is an idea not a cult.
Like all theories that have some level of popularity it has a lot of variations and sub theories. Some are more idealistic than others. These factions have a lot of history with one another a review of the Russian revolution and lead up show the kind of factionalism that exists with the movement. If you study revolutions you know that this is common.
Second, people have used virtually any ideal to justify atrocities. We should not throw out an idea only because someone somewhere used it to justify violence.
Third dogma is a problem. It is used in communist communities in the same way that it is used in the Catholic Church, to try and prevent descension. As noted above communist movements tend to have a lot of factions but the one that gains the most traction always tries to force the others into line. This is common wherever there are new ideas being implemented as policy.
This is likely why people think communism is intent on murdering its enemies. However, every revolution, Russian, French, Haitian, United States, etc. used violence and murder to achieve its goal.
Communists also say that capitalism murders people every day, and they die with a smile on their face. A pittance of a paycheck goes in their widow’s purse while they have died without realizing that they were exploited to death.
Generative ai is just an advanced chat bot, a toy that uses too much power to be efficient.
My personal experience is that any output has to be double checked and edited. It would be better to just do whatever I asked it to do from the beginning. When it can fact check itself and cite sources, then it might become useful.
An ai that can comb through vast amounts of data and give an output of specific data relevant to the question presented than a generative ai might be useful. But it can’t analyze data very well at the current moment. It hallucinates too much.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Privacy@lemmy.world•Asking some reasonable questions about Elon Musk's "help" with the Cybertruck bombing caseEnglish14·7 months agoThey want everyone to know who they are and what they are doing at all times, and they have no sense of shame when they should.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Linux@lemmy.ml•Valve's plan to bring SteamOS to more devices is a promising sign if you want to stop gaming on Windows1·7 months agoI believe so, but I never used it and didn’t read too much on it at the time. It was designed for the steam machine concept they were trying to push at the time. So it would be weird if it wasn’t.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Linux@lemmy.ml•Valve's plan to bring SteamOS to more devices is a promising sign if you want to stop gaming on Windows5·7 months agoOld steam os was an Ubuntu derived OS. Ubuntu has issues relating to the organization that runs it. New steam os is basically a coat of paint on top of Arch which is community based. The old os is deprecated.
The version on steam deck is fantastic, but they have been polishing it for desktop use for a while now. I can’t wait to have it available.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Why do you suppose _sour_ candies are so popular these days? It wasn't a market when I was a kid.2·8 months agoThere’s a company making a new version called retro sours. They are available online or at Cracker Barrel when in stock.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Why do some people defend the billionaires and capitalism?71·9 months agoThey believe that the status quo is better than any alternatives. They have not been exposed to other ways of living and those that have lock themselves to basic tribalistic thinking.
Imagine trying to get a sports fan to see the benefits of being a fan of another sports team. Even if they aren’t personally playing and their team isn’t winning they maintain loyalty. Some even bet on their loser teams and lose money just because of loyalty.
It’s all about team loyalty/ tribalism
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What household item do you wish there was a trial/testing period for?3·11 months agoAre you a land lord?
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Why is HD or 3D so impressive on a flat screen, but we walk around in real life with the highest definition possible and the most realistic 3D and it's completely mundane?7·1 year agoBecause it’s art.
There is a lot of skill and artistic talent needed to create a facsimile of real life. Anyone can draw a tree, but a realistic tree takes some amount of artistic knowledge. The more realistic the more talent that the artist shows. Similarly, when the artist deviates from recreating real life it shows an artistic vision beyond reality.
We like art because it shows a different perspective from the minds eye of the artist. And when the artist can render that vision as something that looks real, even if it couldn’t really exist, it is impressive.
Belgdore@lemm.eeto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•To date, what do you think is the greatest invention or discovery and why?21·1 year agoAir conditioning
It’s easier on your neck to look side to side than it is up and down. So to get more screen real estate it makes more sense to go horizontal. Anecdotally, I constantly have two documents or a document and a web page open next to each other on one monitor. The landscape framing works really well for that.