ParlimentOfDoom

Bots weren’t that fluent yet.

You could certainly say that. It would be weirder if it was the majority of people. See how stupid this argument you’re making is?

Reddit had plenty of shills. Hell like a month or two ago when they announced another setback there were people here saying it was a good idea but they had given up on it.

So, I do.

To all those who vehemently shouted me down when I pointed out how utterly stupid an idea this was when they announced it, who were convinced that the amount of money they were throwing at it garaunteed success, I issue a heartfelt: ha. ha.

Joe Camel begs to differ

YouTube Kids has no ads at all because of this.

Google isn’t doing this because they’re being nice.

Yes. It’s inside my house where no one else can get to it.

Regardless, we should not be pre settling for a terrible policy just because it’s better than an even worse policy. It’s not up to us to solve how to do something that is indefensible. Not when the started goal has a much better solution that isn’t an assault on privacy.

There should be no mechanism broadcasting age information. Flip it, name websites contain content tags, browsers/OS would then block based on opted out content. Parents get controls, we get to keep our privacy.

^crypto shill not. Says the same shit everywhere. Always the same fucking ad

There is no way AI is going to figure out I’m secretly a gorilla living in Saskatchewan and work for the local golf course.

And maybe the janitor should sift through that river of diarrhea for the couple of pennies someone might have swallowed.

Bitcoin is famously a public ledger.