Mélenchon is… frustrating.
He’s the main contender on the limited field of the actual left in France. He’s got a lot of proposals that are actually good and desirable.
He’s also a narcissist and a populist whose stated approach to achieving his proposals is to denounce treaties he doesn’t like and somehow force other countries to replace clauses with whatever it is he wants.
He’s also incapable of compromises, and right now busily torpedoeing the left wing alliance that won the election because his own party didn’t win enough seats to take charge of the alliance.
What I don’t know is, how much of the populist/anti-system talk is just talk for political reasons, and whether he would in fact be capable of the nuance required to govern. He might. He might not. He’s clearly smart and charismatic. But he’s also the type to huff his own farts hard enough to mistake the visions for the truth of the world. So… In that respect, pretty much just like Macron.
France has a big, big problem with overemphasizing individual politicians over policies.
France has a big, big problem with overemphasizing individual politicians over policies.
I think that’s a “humans” problem, really, specially in the last few decades.
I know right? Some countries are much better about it though. In Ireland, Varadkar and Martin recently shared the Taoiseach (prime minister) role when neither of their parties won enough seats to form a government. There wasn’t much fuss about it; it was just a reasonable compromise, so they went and did it.
good answer
100% unprofessional take:
From what I got by quickly screening his Wikipedia article he is a
populistFrench politician on the left witha couple of viewsone view so bonkers most of us on the left don’t want to have people like him on the left.Great, we have a couple of those in Germany too. Have fun with that maniac.
Edit: Made a mistake.
which views?
You know what? I made a mistake. I saw his position on the Russian annexation of Crimea (which is bonkers) and his stance of France leaving NATO (which is straight up stupid) and I didn’t give the rest of the article enough attention. The overwhelming majority of what he stands for is actually pretty neat.
Edit: Again. I have no idea about French politics so don’t quote me on this.
Being anti-NATO is the default stance for Leftists, whether you are Marxist or Anarchist.
Fair play to you.
I know nothing about that name and I’ve been getting by just fine. So I’d say you don’t need to know anything
Counterpoint: I don’t know a lot and my life is a mess.
From current data, it seems the more you know about this person the worse your life is.
Causation or correlation?
I guess the real question is: would my life be improved by knowing who this guy is?