• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2024

help-circle



  • SitD@lemy.loltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldBrave
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    the same freedom that affords him the ability to be a dumbass in public affords you the freedom to not be dead.

    though i do get the worries that come with the extremism spreading out.

    most social media anger is trying to fix problems that aren’t problems. meanwhile politicians get away not pivoting towards UBI. then we get more nationalists, and then we get more social media shitstorms. 😬 anyways, enjoy the ride everyone



  • SitD@lemy.loltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldBrave
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    i don’t get what’s going on in this comment section - are we going to be mad at some code for what a person says on social media?

    i tried running Firefox on my 2018 budget phone and every https handshake takes 5 awkward seconds and it’s more like 0.5 seconds on brave. it’s open source, built in dark mode, and runs well for me. it’s not even a gut feeling thing, on Android this is objectively beating the competition within the privacy conscious space.

    i believe COVID is as natural and genuine as the historically evident spanish flu - but even if someone exists who is too stupid to get it, I’m happily enjoying the fact that he has nothing to do with me




  • that’s true but i think compared to most other consoles nowadays it goes a very sustainable path. valve does nothing to prevent you from running gog games, which are true digital ownership at least. i know physical media are the most tangible option in the moment, but in the long run blurays for example actually have a limited lifespan







  • I’ll chime in with a weird take: this is a privacy community, we are united in a sense of defending our peaceful and unproblematic browsing on the internet and sending messages to friends from lunatics who seem to want everyone treated with the suspicion of highest criminal activity. the article posted describes a “privacy infringement” onto someone who not only has already broken the rule, but strongly publicized it by making people have to smell it. the perpetrators didn’t even have an expectation of privacy, so the premise is ridiculous.

    I’ll say it like this: if the tv detects nicotine patches on someone’s skin, then i pick up the torches and pitchforks.