

The solution is simple: make a product worth using that’s helpful and does what’s advertised, and doesn’t destroy the planet to do so.


The solution is simple: make a product worth using that’s helpful and does what’s advertised, and doesn’t destroy the planet to do so.
you are correct. I did it for the gag, really, so most people could parse it.
ante diem xx Kalendas Maias de anno MMDCCXXII ab urbe condita


I ate Scott Conant’s lamb tagliatelle Ragu and it was really good. Fresh pasta hand made to order by a pro is worth it.


Retrictulating pylons


Part of my idea is that you build your character from your choices - which are tied to cards. I couldn’t work out a good way to get of gendered cards (King/Queen) so I figured maybe you could choose gendered influence over your characters using the semiotics of the cards.
On the other hand - everything could be a slider, or even better, a wheel.


I think that’s probably a scale thing that my 2D card game can probably handle. If you recall D1 used to kick you out of menus and d2 did I think until Forsaken DLC.
I think a UX thing is I want to group or clearly label settings that require a game reset.


what if it doesn’t make you go faster but just adds SPEED EFFECTS


oh I remember the bugged quest for the Richard Nixon doll in Fallout 2 when I was a kid, because they made all the children invisible.


haha, they are going to be FF tactics / Balders Gate 1&2 style avatars but I’m sure I can put some sliders in.


oh I am genuinely excited about how I put that into a card game.
Glorp is on Poob. You can find it on Poob. You can go to Poob and get it. Log onto Poob right now. Go to Poob. Dive into Poob. You can Poob it. It’s on Poob. Poob has it for you. Poob has it for you.
ctrl+r “cmd” return
for me


the sketch is about reselling hair serum to bald men, he controls them because he threatens to withhold the serum unless he can dictate their haircuts.
“You plant the seeds, you get to look at the trees!”
we understand the value of resources now, just in your example the availability and the macro-economics of what a resource is changes.
Crude oil existed for millions of years, but wasn’t a resource until it could be refined. Salt used to be a premium resource, and now is considered a basic one.
So you mean “will gradually readjust to the new value of new reources”
Also, we don’t have “total control” over anything now. Crimes go unreported, unprosecuted, unsolved, rebellion and revolution happens across the globe, protests happen, democracy happens.
You can also choose to start an autonomous community if you want right now - just that most people actually want sewers and toilets and hygiene and warm water and transport and food variety. But if you don’t- you can just go live in the forest.
Then you pivot to saying “I’m being sarcastic - it wouldn’t be a utopia because we wouldn’t have AI”
AI is just matrix math on byte encoding. Just like life was pretty good in 1985 before the internet was popularized and marketed, this one tech product does not drastically affect society.
I would also contend that society isn’t drastically different post-internet. It’s the media of the message that changed, but human communication and structure is still roughly similar to most post-WW2 standards.


Side just means no penetration. Usually it means ok with oral, manual and frotting. You can indicate both (vers, side ok) to indicate you don’t mind someone who isn’t into penetration.
a quick Google returns some projects listed but I didn’t dig in
On one hand I see your point. On t’other, we’ve tried complete neutrality and it failed, maybe it’s time for a communications platform where we hold people to a standard?