What country do you live in?
Anything? Do you mean legally, or morally?
Do you think it’s fine for people to take offense to speech, and collectively agree to exclude a speaker from society over speech?
What about businesses disallowing speech on private property?
I agree, important clarification!
If you don’t support flag burning, you don’t support freedom of speech.
As opposed to “Mr President” which seems common enough
Alma has been good for me the past year or so
How are legislators not able to understand yet that
And
Either some billionaire is convinced there is value in ruining encryption, or a multinational police union back channel is coordinating this messaging (since it’s in the EU as well as the USA)
Sure thing, boss, working on it
Smart guy. Not a good person. Don’t idolize people
‘horrible’ is not a useful metric for human beings. It’s entirely subjective. If you want to define it as their net impact on the world (still pretty vague), then yes - negative actions are not counterbalanced by hypothetical good intentions
Option #2 is basically werewolves.
If my Age of Empires knowledge serves, you can just crank out a pantload of mangonels and start blasting before the trebuchets have time to set up and reduce your town to rubble
Oh agreed entirely. You can also use different execution strategies to mitigate most performance issues, but it can require some tuning at full enterprise scale.
I won’t hear any sass about Ansible. It doesn’t scale up to infinity but it’s the best there is at what it’s good at (modular, small scale declarative orchestration)
For a few years you just had to find a sharp rock
This is a good time to remember that as a species, we optimize towards a balance between least effort and highest reward probability and not “objective best”.