Visit about:compat in your firefox. I find it insane that these exist.

Edit: I’ve learned that this is part of the webcompat system addon developed by Mozilla and other contributors. I see why this is beneficial default behavior, since FF has no chance of getting enough market share to matter more if things are broken.

However, this behavior is too intrusive for my taste. For example this injection: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/8a4afb4d34f8/browser/extensions/webcompat/injections/js/bug1472075-bankofamerica.com-ua-change.js is basically just to silence annoying user reports.

Also, Every site FF pretends to be a different UA on is artificially reducing FF market share data.

  • mvirts@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t know if it’s objectively stupid, but the surprise I experienced discovering that my browser has a bunch of hacks built in to fix external website problems lowers the trust I have in Firefox.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Lol, you do realise that chrome does many more. They were recently discovered to allow extra access to google meet over competitors. So not just creepy, but anticompetitive.

      I think a more aggressive approach would be better for sites that dont offer compatibility with Firefox.

      Do a pop up that asks the user to help make chsnge. First few users to encounter the site could be asked to see if they could find the contact details to let the site know about the problem. Once that is correct, following users could be asked to message them to let them know its a problem.

      Keep upping the volume with bad publicity about their website not following standards and bekgn deficient and they will change.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I like the thought, but I can’t imagine that most people will enjoy getting even more popups when they load up a site, especially when they come from the browser itself.

        Just take a look at OP here. If they responds this way to settings that are there for their actual benefit - just imagine how much they’ll like those popups.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yes but thats the point. You could offer the option. This site is trying to block open standards. We can apply a fix to correct it. Would you like to Tell site to fix it/Apply fix/Leave unsafe site

          Then you have all options.

      • mvirts@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This is closer to what I would be happy with. Firefox could offer an official compatibility extension for each site.

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          How about, if you want a broken version of Firefox, you compile it yourself, rather than let everyone else suffer?
          Like, the vast majority of browser users don’t even know what an extension is, let alone install one.

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 hours ago

      they’re trying to ensure an acceptable UX with their browser.

      I suppose the root of the issue is developers specifically targeting and testing on chrome.

      I don’t understand how this would make Firefox look bad unless you’re pointing at the dire browser share situation.