guyrocket@kbin.social to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 7 months agoWhat ever happened to nanotechnology? Seems like it disappeared.message-squaremessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1169arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1160arrow-down1message-squareWhat ever happened to nanotechnology? Seems like it disappeared.guyrocket@kbin.social to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 7 months agomessage-square78fedilinkfile-text
Most are probably too young to remember but nanotechnology was supposed to be the most super amazing thing ever.
minus-squareSethayy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 months agoShit you and us all. Worst part of nano is that error is intristic, how much error is where the fun comes in
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.mindoki.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoIn the maths in Engines of creation, the errors were supposedly so small they were negligible.
minus-squareSethayy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoFor sure, and thats generally the goal of any engieering - the biggest question is what error are we measuring? Something like vesting a fully autonomous drone, not even close; tubes in a funny shape that trap all light, were already there 99.9%
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.mindoki.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoIIRC it was around one misplaced atom every century for some throughput. It’s like digital vs analog or so I understood it.
Shit you and us all.
Worst part of nano is that error is intristic, how much error is where the fun comes in
In the maths in Engines of creation, the errors were supposedly so small they were negligible.
For sure, and thats generally the goal of any engieering - the biggest question is what error are we measuring? Something like vesting a fully autonomous drone, not even close; tubes in a funny shape that trap all light, were already there 99.9%
IIRC it was around one misplaced atom every century for some throughput. It’s like digital vs analog or so I understood it.