Please explain my confused me like I’m 5 (0r 4 or 6).

  • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
    62·
    1 年前

    the idea that the year 2000 is the start of the 21st century is hurting my head.

    That may be because it is not. The first century was years 1 to 100. The second was 101 to 200. The 21st is therefore 2001 to 2100.

    What you’re probably referring to is the “cultural century” which was considered to have started when the lead digit changed from 1 to 2. The same thing happened quite recently when some people argued 2020 was the start of a new decade (again, it wasn’t)

    • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zoneEnglish
      33·
      1 年前

      I hate it when people say it wasnt the start of a new decade, it’s a shit argument, why does it matter what the first year was, 2014 - 2024 is also a decade, and 2pm aest September 22nd 2024 will also be the start of a new decade. There is nothing wrong with saying 2020 was the start of a new decade. (again, it was)

      • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
        32·
        1 年前

        There are decades and there are decades. Just like there are weeks (period between Monday and Sunday inclusive) and weeks (any seven consecutive days).

        When you say “I’ll do this next week”, then you mean the next period between Monday and Sunday. When you say you’ll do it in a week, it means you’ll do it after exactly 7 days from now, regardless of what day is it today. Same for decades.

        • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zoneEnglish
          21·
          1 年前

          You said start of a new decade, not the new decade in the original comment, they are very different

            • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zoneEnglish
              1·
              1 年前
              1. when I originally replied to you, I very obviously did not know that you meant that

              2. didn’t know you weren’t a native speaker either