• Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
    0·
    1 year ago

    All modules that call a Unix library contain WoW64 thunks to enable calling the 64-bit Unix library from 32-bit PE code. This means that it is possible to run 32-bit Windows applications on a purely 64-bit Unix installation. This is called the new WoW64 mode, as opposed to the old WoW64 mode where 32-bit applications run inside a 32-bit Unix process.

    🦀🦀🦀

    • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
      0·
      1 year ago

      So in the future no need to install 32 bit packages of wine in a 64 system??? 👀

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        0·
        1 year ago

        Correcto. Which means Steam will probably drop 32 bit libs soon. Which means Ubuntu will stop shipping 32 libs. The era is truly coming to an end

        • StefanT@lemmy.world
          0·
          1 year ago

          Let’s call it “soonish”. The old proton versions still need 32 bit libs if they do not backport the feature.

          • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
            0·
            1 year ago

            Old Proton builds probably won’t backport this (unless it’s completely isolated, idk the code layout of Wine). But are old Proton builds still necessary? Occasionally there’s regressions, but are there really any games that require like a 2 year old Proton build?

  • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    🎉🎉🎉

    Yet another major release that fails do support basic Win32 APIs available since Windows 95 properly.

    🎉🎉🎉

      • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        Too bad time isn’t refundable. Free software is only free if you don’t factor in the time you spend making it work.

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          0·
          1 year ago

          Wow, you’re the most entitled user of free software I’ve met in a while. Just buy a windows license next time.

          • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
            0·
            1 year ago

            Well at least I’m not here perpetuating the delusion that desktop Linux desktop is as user-friendly and productive for every use-case as Windows and macOS are. If one lives in a bubble and doesn’t to collaborate with others then native Linux apps might work and might even deliver a decent workflow. Once collaboration with Windows/Mac users is required then it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.

            Windows licenses are cheap and things work out of the box. Software runs fine, all vendors support whatever you’re trying to do and you’re productive from day zero. Sure, there are annoyances from time to time, but they’re way fewer and simpler to deal with than the hoops you’ve to go through to get a minimal and viable/productive Linux desktop experience.

            It all comes down to a question of how much time (days? months?) you want to spend fixing things on Linux that simply work out of the box under Windows for a minimal fee. Buy a Windows license and spend the time you would’ve spent dealing with Linux issues doing your actual job and you’ll, most likely, get a better ROI.

            Just buy a windows license next time.

            Here’s the thing, I can get a legit Windows license by various means. I don’t need to go into microsoft.com and get it for 300$, a second hand windows machine with an old i5 CPU will sell for 50$ and that includes a valid Windows license. Computers selling on retail stores also include a Windows license, students can get them for free etc. what else?

              • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
                0·
                1 year ago

                Oh yes, I value and like Linux a LOT… just not for desktop as it doesn’t deliver as everyone says it does. To be fair I believe that only someone who values Linux as much as I do would be comfortable to criticize what’s wrong with it.