• AntY@lemmy.world
    401·
    5 months ago

    Vi hasn’t been updated since 2005. Aren’t everyone just using vim or neovim?

    • smeg@feddit.ukEnglish
      37·
      5 months ago

      I use whatever the machine gives me when I type vi, I assume it’s usually vim

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        18·
        5 months ago

        Huh, vi for me has always been actual vi, not vim. Didn’t know some systems symlink vi to vim.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          24·
          5 months ago

          A long time ago, someone posted advocating symlinking vi to emacs. Evil, but entertaining.

        • lime!@feddit.nuEnglish
          11·
          5 months ago

          vim has a limited “vi-mode” that it uses if you call it as vi. so it could still be vim.

          • communism@lemmy.ml
            4·
            5 months ago

            Ohh that makes more sense. Yeah perhaps, although come to think of it I still need to install vim from the package manager even if vi works fresh out of the box so maybe not?

            • lime!@feddit.nuEnglish
              3·
              5 months ago

              i think there’s also a vim-mini that gets installed by default in some debian-based distros.

              • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                1·
                5 months ago

                I had to make an alias vim=vim.tiny in raspberry pi since standard vim is not installed by default

        • Xanza@lemm.eeEnglish
          7·
          5 months ago

          Vim is the preferred experience, so it’s for end users. Unless you have a system with no real addons and classic *nix environment, you’re almost always going to be using Vim. Alpine linux is a good example of a stripped down environment that still uses Vi.

    • Xanza@lemm.eeEnglish
      10·
      5 months ago

      Not to imply that Vi is perfect, but Vi is perfect. What do you need an update for? /s