I am not overly happy with my current firewall setup and looking into alternatives.

I previously was somewhat OK with OPNsense running on a small APU4, but I would like to upgrade from that and OPNsense feels like it is holding me back with it’s convoluted web-ui and (for me at least) FreeBSD strangeness.

I tried setting up IPfire, but I can’t get it to work reliably on hardware that runs OPNsense fine.

I thought about doing something custom but I don’t really trust myself sufficiently to get the firewall stuff right on first try. Also for things like DHCP and port forwarding a nice easy web GUI is convenient.

So one idea came up to run a normal Linux distro on the firewall hardware and set up OPNsense in a VM on it. That way I guess I could keep a barebones OPNsense around for convenience, but be more flexible on how to use the hardware otherwise.

Am I assuming correctly that if I bind the VM to hardware network interfaces for WAN and LAN respectively it should behave and be similarly secure to a bare metal firewall?

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
    0·
    8 months ago

    Sounds great. What about hardware acceleration features of the NIC? I read somewhere that its better to disable the support for that in OPNsense when running it in a VM?

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
        0·
        8 months ago

        I just saw that option. What would be the advantages and disadvantages of this?

        I guess when I pass the actual NIC device the hardware acceleration should work?

        Edit: Looks like my host system does not support this, at least that is the error I get when trying ;)

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          0·
          8 months ago

          For one you offload the entire processing and driver handling to the VM, so if the OS wants to do something funky, it can.