Ahoy mateys, it’s time to setup Jellyfin if you prefer not to pay for the privilege of self-hosting your own content.

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/27204525

We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

  • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
    732·
    4 months ago

    The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature.

    What “resources” do you need, exactly, to allow my friends to stream from my server?

    • Pika@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      361·
      4 months ago

      mr crabs money meme with mr crabs and an announcer outside of the krusty crab

      for real though, such a dumb decision on plex’s part lol

    • Carrot@lemmy.todayEnglish
      22·
      4 months ago

      Developers to keep things up to date and secure. Which I wouldn’t mind paying for, but instead they spend it all on making Plex a social media that emails your friends a list of shows you watch? I can tell you right now that other than “watch together” no one is using the Plex social features on purpose

        • uxellodunum@lemmy.mlEnglish
          3·
          4 months ago

          Just to make it clear to any other people reading this, Jellyfin has Group Sync where you can create groups with participants and syncplay media.

        • nimbledaemon@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          1·
          4 months ago

          LMAO that’s like 90% of the reason I went with plex in the first place. Just switched over to Jellyfin this weekend. Pretty seamless.

    • Scary le Poo@beehaw.orgEnglish
      172·
      4 months ago

      As long as you have Plex pass it’s all good and nothing changes. That said, this was exactly my reaction. Plex expends exactly zero fucking resources for my server, so wtf is this shit supposed to mean?

      • kieron115@startrek.websiteEnglish
        31·
        4 months ago

        I’m pretty sure that’s corporate speak for “we need to drive plex pass subscriptions more so we need to lock more feature behind it.”

        • skankhunt42@lemmy.caEnglish
          11·
          4 months ago

          This is 100% my opinion too.

          I’m annoyed that I supported them and got a lifetime account on sale. At the same time I’m happy that I can take my time testing and moving my family and friends over to something else.

      • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
        64·
        4 months ago

        What does that have to do with my friends streaming from my server?

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zoneEnglish
          7·
          4 months ago

          they never said they needed resources for the remote playback… they said that they needed more resources - ie money to develop the software in general, and this are feature gating a useful feature to try and convince people to pay

          • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
            42·
            4 months ago

            they never said they needed resources for the remote playback…

            That’s exactly what it sounds like to me…

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zoneEnglish
              4·
              4 months ago

              that’s fine… but it’s not necessarily what it says. it’s ambiguous at best, but if they’d meant they need you to pay them for resources then theyd probably say it more outright

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.orgEnglish
          51·
          4 months ago

          Their revenue stream is based on license fees for the software? So if they want to keep the lights on they need money

          • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
            41·
            4 months ago

            Okay so you agree it’s nothing to do with “resources” and everything to do with locking features behind paywalls to drive up revenue?

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.orgEnglish
              81·
              4 months ago

              developers are a “resource” and they need to be paid. Do you want to keep getting updates for your server? Someone needs to do that and that someone wants to be paid in this case

          • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
            53·
            4 months ago

            The software already exists, and has for decades.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.eeEnglish
              41·
              4 months ago

              Then just ask them if they would share their work for free, or recreate it yourself?

              • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
                43·
                4 months ago

                They’re already sharing it for free