Private property? Freedom of speech? Freedom to breed? Freedom of thought?..

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We’re talking about a better world and giving up freedoms. Americans have given up a bunch of freedoms and have gotten a worse world because of it.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The one does not flow directly from the other. A better world requires some protecting from each other, which means giving up some freedoms. A system of complete and total freedom would not be good for most people.

      However, as Franken said, it is important not to give up essential freedoms. What freedoms, exactly, count as “essential” ones? Hard to say. We should have a thread to discuss it.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yes, the freedom to murder people would not be good for most people, but you are taking away others’ freedoms when you do that. But, this thread is about private property, speech, starting a family, and thought. Maybe I should have been more specific in my original comment. A better world wouldn’t require sacrificing these freedoms. It would require giving up the freedom to take others’ freedoms away.

        Any freedom that means you have control over your own body and thoughts, I would consider an “essential” freedom, and those are the ones that I mean when I say a better world wouldn’t require giving up those freedoms. If you’re giving up your right to control your own body, you’re inviting a worse world.