• rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Then again, am I really using these Haskell libraries? I just want to use pandoc. I love Arch, but the organization of the official repos is sometimes suboptimal.

      • Goddard Guryon@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Last I checked (which was some time ago), pandoc-bin doesn’t require the haskell dependencies. I saved quite some installation time (and screen space during installation) by switching.

        • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Used pandoc-bin before and agree it’s more compact, but I had some issues with citation management recently, so went back to standard pandoc.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Someone has never done software development or worked on a build pipeline and it shows. Obviously complex software has lots of dependencies especially compiling from source.

  • Zozano@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Most people in this thread don’t get it.

    You know how some people compete to see who can get Doom to run on the craziest platforms, like a calculator?

    Installing Arch with the fewest packages is like that. There’s something oddly satisfying about stripping everything back to the most basic level - to make things work for you within the most constrictive environment you enforce for yourself.

    It’s like eating a spicy shellfish dinner and super gluing your asshole closed.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every person who comments about “bloat” in their install should be required to preface their post or comment with a full definition of “bloat.”

    This shit is obnoxious.

  • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    > Install NixOS
    > Learn about Nix
    > Organise your dotfiles
    > Learn about flakes
    > Organise your dotfiles
    > Learn about modularisation
    > Organise your dotfiles
    > ...
    
  • jroid8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You can use window managers instead of DEs. While I prefer DEs because how much features they have you may not need these features

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It is bloat if dependencies aren’t defined properly and the packager defines a too broad set of dependencies.

      (Disclaimer: I don’t use Arch myself but I am a packager of a small “scratch my own itch” but public repository for another distribution.)

    • Lemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is there a way to download Debian with GNOME without all the bloat?

      • Username@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You don’t use GNOME to get rid of bloat. You use it to get a fully functional opinionated desktop without tweaking too much.

        If you want no “bloat”, whatever that is, use some minimal compositor like Sway or something.

        Personally, I say: Give me all the bloat, I love it! I love every cool and quality of life feature there is. I have enough space on any desktop computer.

        • Lemmy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yes, I understand that, but I don’t need all the games and stuff installed by default. Sway is a whole different experience. I use i3 on my older laptop (Macbook A1181 w/ Libreboot) but I personally wouldn’t want to use it unless I needed to.

          GNOME is a gorgeous desktop environment, I just hate the fact that I have to take a additional 5-10 minutes every install just removing all the stuff I don’t need. Is there a debloater script for GNOME that you know of?

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Step 1. Install the most secure, pure, minimalist Linux distro

      Step 2. Get frustrated at the complications

      Step 3. Give up and go back to Windows

      • a story I’ve seen happen more than once
      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Step 1. Install user-friendly Linux distro

        Step 2. Get frustrated at the complications

        Step 3. Try to check back on Windows

        Step 4. Get completely disgusted, realize just HOW much bloated and slow and terrible Windows is

        Step 5. Learn Linux-fu and live happy ever after

        That’s my path

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Go back to windows is not an option, it’s a really horrible system. I dont see how people can use it without blowing their brains out.

        • sum_yung_gai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It just works. I don’t want to have to invest time in making my os work. I want to spend my time on my projects(which I use wsl for)

          I totally understand the desire and satisfaction of having complete control over your os but a lot of people just want to be able to do simple stuff like game and browse the web which windows does just fine in my experience.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d argue Linux falls short on audience that needs a little more than browsing and simple games, but are themselves a little less than sysadmins. That’s the audience that is really hurt by the transition. The rest (simple as well as power users) should be just fine.

            Even still, with Windows being the mainstream option, it just goes as a no-brainer and a default solution for the majority of people, regardless of how good or bad it is.

      • pizzazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        For me unfortunately it has been Step 1 install literally the most universally compatible distro possible

        Step 2 audio drivers craps out. No fix is available. Trying to apply workarounds completely Bork the system

        Step 3 install again. graphics driver is problematic, refresh it giving it MOS permissions. I miss the MOS permission screen at the reboot. Look for how to do obtain that option again. No easy way to do it at all. Bork the system again

        Step 4 install again. Notice touch screen support is completely useless, and pen is not supported.

        Step 5 Ask myself if keeping a 1200$ computer with tinny audio, no graphic hardware acceleration and a half functional display can be justified in any way. It can’t.

        Step 5. Back to windows. Bloated, but it works.

        Unfortunately system support is still very iffy on some models. I’d really like to embrace the distro life but can’t.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Without claiming that I would be able to fix any problems, I’m curious which hardware that is. In all honesty I can’t remember the actual audio driver ever crapping out in the last 15 or so years. I find this fascinating and like to know more.

          The set of hardware I’ve had most problems with had been various types of WiFi adapters from Realtek and Broadcom.