• Ibaudia@lemmy.worldEnglish
    15·
    1 year ago

    I’m really glad DaVinci Resolve exists to fill the void of a proper video editor too, Kdenlive just ain’t it for me.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        3·
        1 year ago

        doesn’t support AAC

        Use OPUS. Better and free.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          6·
          1 year ago

          The point was probably that if your equipment or sources use aac, you will need to transcode it, losing quality in the process. We don’t always control our media sources and the formats they use.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              12·
              1 year ago

              If it even doesn’t support import and export in those formats, you can try externally decode audio and video and store in lossless format. FLAC for audio and something like FFV1 for video.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            1·
            1 year ago

            Since you are cutting video in pieces, applying filters and all the fun stuff, you are transcoding it anyway.

            • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
              1·
              1 year ago

              Yes, but then you would be transcoding an already transcoded video, potentially making the losses apparent. It would be better to just transcode once at the exporting process.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                1·
                1 year ago

                It would be better to just transcode once at the exporting process.

                Lossy encoding only happens once in both cases.

                How direct import-export works: input file -> lossy format decompressor of editor -> filters -> lossy format compressor of editor -> output

                How external codecs work: input -> external lossy format decompressor -> intermediate representation(lossless codec, can be just storing raw frames) -> IR decoder of editor -> filters -> IR encoder of editor -> external lossy format compressor -> output

                Both options have only one lossy step - lossy encoder. Or technically two - also filters, but this is editor’s intention.

                • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
                  3·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh, I get it now, you mean using a lossless format as intermediate. Well, it would work but still it would be better if they didn’t require this extra work on linux.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      4·
      1 year ago

      I love kden, very logical ui and love that it can do anything. What is it about DaVinci that appeals?

      • Ibaudia@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7·
        1 year ago

        Both work well, but DaVinci is better with color grading, audio post-production, visual effects, collaboration, and format support, just to name a few. It’s a professional product made for professionals.