Today most Invidious instances are experiencing very harsh ip address rate limiting, it is becoming very very hard to watch yt videos through

      • abbenm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Exactly. For any proposed change, it’s going to run up against what I like to call Status Quo Extremism, which is a mindset that suggests that “But that would be different from the status quo” counts as a defeater argument against proposed changes.

        The combination of incentives would, as you note, need to be driven by niche interests rather than attempting to reproduce the incentives of the top 0.01% of YouTube creators.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Greedy, yes. But also lots of people believe since long ago that some things on the Internet should be “at no monetary cost” (gratis) It should become common for people to donate money for some things even if it is very little.

      • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As long as trash like mrbeast is watched by so many people, I have no hope that the broad public will use anything like what we want in the near future.

        • Zerthax@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Monetization shifted the focus from niche hobbyist content to gimmicky shit that is tailored to get a bunch of views. When I see a thumbnail of someone with a weird facial expression, it’s my cue to look elsewhere.