No you’re right you just need the cash.

Go ahead and start your own memory fab then, there’s no regulation stopping you apparently.

No, there’s plenty of regulation, it’s corrupt regulation and that’s not free market.

Nothing free about us markets lol

Because in the us if you bribe the president anything is legal. Here, legal just means you bribed the president. If you didn’t bribe him it’s not legal.

NOBODY LEARNS BEST BY RTFM BUT WE DO IT ANYWAY SUCK IT UP

That’s true and it js a scary thing long term

An Argentinean in the wild, FFFUUUUAAAAAA

Literally nobody has ever used vosotros outside of spain. I have heard “vuestra merced” in telenovelas lol

They can just host in other countries

Absolutely, i mean it’s gonna be a computer testing the image for “humanity” so of course a computer could cheat the test.

I mean it’s also trivially easy for ai to make a photorealistic image of a human, i dont see how this could possibly ever work. Whatever test they apply would be almost by definition cheatable by AI.

Well what I want doesn’t matter because I have no power. Are you saying peaceful gradual change never works at all? I agree it’s not working in the US at all. But ultimately it’s because that what those in power want. It would be a lot better if they allowed peaceful improvements, like has happened in some other countries, that’s what I’m saying. There’s also plenty of “proper revolutions” that end up with rich getting richer and poor getting poorer.

Yes but there’s different levels of violence. Some countries had more violent deadly revolutions than others. Maybe India is the main example, yes too many people died but it wasn’t on the level of some other revolutions and wars.

Yes of course, doesn’t mean the leaders of the faction who win the civil war will install them.

I mean it’s the classic revolutionary’s dilemma – does bringing the system down, which causes incredible amounts of death and suffering for the poor, worth it in the long run? IMHO it never is, because the system always finds the most painful and evil ways to go down, with no guarantee the next system is any better.

Ideally the system itself improves over time like we saw happen in the 20th century in a lot of other countries, and social democracy takes over peacefully. But sometimes the capitalists won’t let that happen and insist on a tragic and violent decline instead.

I guess my point is they used to have a lot more power in China than they do now. It didn’t have to be this way, the oil billionaires and automobile CEO could have found a way to monopolize renewables and EV technology at home too. They just operated off of fear and laziness instead of bravery and industriousness.

But that’s what im saying – high tarrifs doesn’t skow down technological innovation in China, of course they’re way ahead of us now on EV technology. Yes, they did it to keep power over their United Statesian subjects, by keeping us in the dark they have more control over us. China didn’t slow down at all because of that.

But that’s just handing China the advantage without a fight, it doesn’t slow them down at all. That’s why it makes no sense.

That makes no sense lmao