Immutable Distro - When making a roll, if the previous roll did not use this feature, you may use the dice value of the last roll you made.
Highly Configurable - You can swap one piece of equipment per turn as a free action.
Flake or Vanilla? - You must succeed on a DC 20 WIS save once every hour or be compelled to spend that hour respeccing your equipment loadout and retraining your skills, in an attempt to achieve the elusive state known as “best practice”.
Why are we assuming they’d want to optimize it? If they went through the trouble of simulating the entire universe, they probably either have a particular goal in mind, or have such a ludicrously large amount of resources that it doesn’t matter.
There’s no functional difference, unless you can accurately predict someone’s actions, and to do that you’d need to predict the environment in which someone is making choices as well, which requires omniscience. So, there’s no functional difference.
I’ve seen a kde configuration thing but it needs home-manager I think
Afaik, Gnome is very opinionated about how it should work. This makes it work out of the box, but if it does something that you don’t like, it might be a pain to fix it. I use KDE because configuring it is relatively fast and easy, and it has some neat features and custom plugins.
I wouldn’t expect shaving cream to do it; goo and foam and pretty normal
Those videos are so relaxing to watch
Yeah, it’s worth it. Plus maybe I can help.
Have some more chicken
Have some more pie
It doesn’t matter if it’s boiled or fried
I second WizTree, it takes <10s to scan an entire drive and the visualization is neat
Yup. If the standard gets too complicated, it starts to get hard to implement and use, and feature restriction might be necessary for certain use-cases. We want to keep it “good enough” because that ensures it’s simple and easy to use, rather than something more capable but more complex like HTML.
I always forget, is CommonMark good enough? Like with table and image support?
AMIR (All Magic Is Roofies)
That would be neat, but if he’s looking to actually play the game, those cards won’t be usable. If he’s younger (and needs real cards to play at all) then that will probably matter more to him than a hand-drawn card would.
Sell these musical slots to artists for a few million apiece
Profit
Yes, I mean an axis break to denote that part of the axis has been omitted. Using it to show a gap between 0 and the lowest included data in the dataset is very common and is a proper use even according to your own source:
A zigzag on the line of the x- or y-axis in a line or a bar graph indicating that the data being displayed does not include all of the values that exist on the number line being used
Beginning the Y axis at 0 and using an axis break to go from there to 7 million allows you to see the same amount of detail as you can in the OP, while visually signalling to the reader that the scale on that axis does not show a full 0 to 10 million range. This increases the chance that they’ll read the graph correctly. You can justifiably blame someone for reading it wrong, but the point of a graph is to communicate, so minimizing the chance for misinterpretation is a good idea.
This reading comprehension joke it overused and it doesn’t even make sense here. It’s well-known that you need at least one of those little zigzag indicators when the graph doesn’t start at 0 in most cases to avoid people misinterpreting the graph and to make it much more visually clear.
I thought you were supposed to throw the hammer at the nail
Like I said, how can you prove that free will exists now? We could very well already live in your scenario, and the world isn’t ending because of a lack of free will (if it doesn’t exist). I mean, it is ending, but not because of free will or the lack thereof.