• 2 Posts
  • 244 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • Nobody’s raving about the install, that’s just useful for people who don’t know what makes a Linux distro.

    It becomes your personality after a few years because every update might break anything, and you need to regularly maintain random shit. Also if you forget to update regularly, the chance of everything crapping out rises exponentially.

    I hope you’re using something like btrfs, because rollbacks are a must.


  • Does your company have a serious IT department that manage devices?

    If yes, then you’ll need to do whatever they say, and be ready to be told that’s not happening.

    If not, I’d suggest a stable distro, encrypt the disk, and use flatpak/nix to install fresh packages. Fedora could work, but I’ve had bad luck with it, and wouldn’t want to risk my device crapping out because of an update.

    The rest is really going to depend on your work and your it department.


  • Separate your system and user lists. Use home-manager for example for your user packages. I think separating those configs is the official recommendation.

    As for the rest, I’m using nix on MX because of declarative package management. Screw going back to imperative and having to remember what packages to install. If it’s something I use often it goes on a list, if I don’t nix shell comes to the rescue.

    I’d rather mess around with dev envs for nix than distrobox.













  • Ubuntu, RHEL and Fedora use it as the default and they are very big distros. Idk if it’s enough but that’s what I know.

    I mean, that’s pretty irrelevant. If you were for example at least comparing the downloads of fedora Vs spins, that would be a beginning of something.

    Idk. KDE was unstable for me and it always has bugs after major releases. They should test things better.

    1. In case it wasn’t obvious: stability is not reliability

    2. So does GNOME, especially when you have a lot of extensions

    3. KDE is pretty crap in both regards

    Personal opinion.

    Is that why every distro comes with vanilla GNOME? Oh wait…

    But hey at least it’s getting better over time.

    Meanwhile over the years KDE got lighter than GNOME while constantly piling on features.


  • the most popular

    Citation very much needed

    one of the most stable DEs on Linux

    Hardly, but I’m guessing you’re thinking of reliability instead. Not really surprising when it’s so stripped down that vanilla GNOME is pretty much unusable. When you extend it, in order to get a proper DE, that goes right out the window.

    That fact makes it especially funny that vanilla GNOME is by far the fattest DE around. How it manages to use up more resources than KDE is beyond me.