I wonder whether adding additional trackers only increases the speed in which peers are found or whether it also substantially increases the likelihood of finding peers.

One begets the other, although your mileage may vary

lol, wow

I don’t know. I’ve been applying for jobs for seven years online, and I haven’t gotten a fucking thing.

I have 30, 20, 15, and 10 years of experience in the four major career fields I pursue, and I can never, not once not ever, get even a reply back, let alone an explanation as to why I wouldn’t fit the role.

It has been my experience that, yes, the user experience of DuckDuckGo is far superior to that of Google, but, DuckDuckGo doesn’t always provide the precise results. I’m looking for. I can still get the information, but it takes a little bit more work.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m definitely not shilling for Google. Their search engine has definitely gone to shit in the last 5 to 8 years. But DuckDuckGo simply doesn’t have the incredible precision that Google can if it’s properly used.

I use both

Was this article written 15 years ago? Because this is anything but a new occurrence.

No

I really hope someone would come around and try to do it the correct and rights-respecting way just to show how full of crap this guy is.

On the other hand, this “AI” garbage needs to calm the hell down so everyone can actually be reasonable about what they’re accomplishing. LLMs are not “AI”. They are a very tiny piece of a very big puzzle that will, eventually, develop into AI.

And the jury is still out on as to whether that is a great idea or the worst idea ever.

OK. Bye-bye.

I just got a $200 TLC TV that supports Dolby vision.