Maharashtra

Would that be all?

Would that be all?

Yes, yes, of course.

Now, would that be all?

Keep it to the single branch of discussion, since you don’t have much to say anyway, please.

I see

What I don’t see is any proof that your ideas arn’t anything but pro-pedophila propaganda that is meant to be “someone else’s problem”.

But, of course, you won’t ever deliver any kind of proof that it’s not.

So, would that be all?

What responsibilities?

Classic.

Same old repertoire of a coward faced with “proof yourself right” dillema.

Anyway.

Would that be all?

“This is the end of discussion!”

Right. Self-importance, helluiva drug, am I right?

We are in an anonymous text thread

…but it didn’t prevent you from using “everyone who may read it will think you idiot” argument.

You’re not thinking straight.

Would that be all, or are you going to continue, still trying to avoid your responsibilites?

“It’s over… B-bbut not really! I don’t care about any further discussion and let me tell you in length just how much I don’t care!”

Predictable. The likes of you are all talk. You can’t get enough of your own words, you feel euphoric about re-reading your comments (and whole discussion while at that) at least a few times.

But that’s just talk, no walk. And as such it deserves no attention.

Would that be all?

I see you’re a broken record now,

Yes. There’s no merit in a discussion where one side pushes possibly troubling, hurtful propaganda and ideals, while not being ready to actually back them up with actions, thus setting an example that it can be done, that it’s not that bad. Much like every dictator ever demands for others to make it happen.

You’re wrong.

Feel free to prove it in real word, Internet dictator.

That will be all.

It was over long ago.

If you were honest about your philosophy, you’d seek some way to prove it - and yourself - to be solid, logical and, well, honest.

But you’re not. You’re looking for explanations, excuses, ways to divert the discussion, distractions, and finally insults. Like an undereducated AIs guided by inflexible software.

There’s no way in hell that you’re going to ever take the responsibility for your choices and suggestions. Because all you have in store is a bunch of idiotic ideas that are supposed to be "other poeople’s burden.

Would that be all?

I did read yours. What makes you think otherwise?

The fact that you constantly avoid the challenge of proving your convictions true and correct.

The other explanation is that you’re simply scared of it, or trolling, but I preferred to think you were simply too preoccupied with writing yet another comment. I don’t anymore.

I wouldn’t need to prove shit

Uh-huh. You absolutely has to do, since “burden of proof…” and all that.

But you won’t. Because you realize how weak, irresponsible and “let this be other people’s problem” your train of logic is.

Fgures.

You didn’t read my comment.

You didn’t read mine. No wonder, given how self-absorbed you are…

I want nothing to do with fucking criminals.

Ah, so everything’s fine and dandy with ya, if they aren’t caught and sentenced? Brilliant strategy, milord!

Now, I give you simple challenge: prove that you’re willing to set an example and coexist with those loathsome deviants you want for the society to embrace.

If you can’t, if you don’t want to - admit that your ideas aren’t that good.

Right. Because if I knew someone who was one, they’d openly admit that to me. (…)

Prisons are full of these.

Send a letter. Interact with one. Invite him over to your house once he gets released.

Go on. Walk the walk.

Prove that you’re more than a cowardly wannabe-dictator who enjoys listening to his own voice more than to common reason.

Do it.

Please do not talk to me about science’s powerlessness to help “the poor”. For starters, it’s far from powerless. And I’d like to remind you that it’s not 1980, but 2023 year. Sex change therapies, hormone blockers, antidepressants and more aids to change not only one’s mental, but also physical self are available.

Providing one wants to search for them.

With that out of mind…

Listen now, and listen well, dude… The likes of you enjoy to take pity on “broken, twisted, wretched, weak” and think it’s humane to accept them into society. But you lot never entertain the idea of living door to door with the ones you’d want to defend. In your heads it all sounds nice, and logical, and honorable. But you want it to become other people’s burden, other people’s responsibility, other people’s struggle.

You say “I, me, mine, myself” as examples of how things are or might be, but you don’t put yourself in the scenarios that your ideas lead to. You won’t put the money where your mouth is, you won’t stain your hands with dirty job, you won’t strain your back with the weight that your ideas bring with them. You want for others to get the job done. You want to dictate to others what to do, what to think, how to act.

Want to make a point? Want to prove a thing? Go, befriend a convicted pedophile. Go, invite a guy known of masturbating to pictures of children like Madeleine to your home, to talk, play and touch your child. You may also want to tell everything you wrote to the people who suffered because of pedophiles.

Then we talk.

Should AI Child Porn and Sex Dolls be Illegal?

Yes.

Extremely evil and twisted tendencies should be both forbidden and treated, not allowed and accepted. In this case, it’s not an outlet - it’s encouragement. “Oh, I don’t need to seek help, I can manage it thanks to AI”.

Hard stop.