• 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Arch is only the larval stage. When a Linuxite consumes enough CLI, they metamorphose into one of two adult forms: a Void user, or a NixOS user. As these two adult forms are incompatible, this is a rare case of species divergence within a life cycle. Even more oddly, like the axolotl, many Arch users never leave the larval stage, and continue living comfortably in their ecological niche.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, that comment leaves out the “I learned a lot from Arch, but don’t have the time to manage evertything anymore” crowd, which goes Ubuntu -> Arch -> Debian/Mint/Fedora

          • I discovered that EndeavourOS satisfied that for me, without me having to give up Arch. And snapper+btrfs-grub has eliminated any interest in messing about with the new line of immutable systems. The only tempting distro I might spend time in is Chimera Linux (link, b/c of an unfortunate naming conflict) which (a little hilariously) is an attempt to make a Linux distro that’s purely Gnu-free. Chimera also runs dinit instead of systemd, and that’s interesting.

            Anyway, there are a couple of options that let a user stay in Arch but make things less… fussy.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I gunked up my system with too much AUR, even with endeavourOS. NixOS might be a bit more suitable for my ADHD brain.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        As someone who switched to nixos - eh. So much hacking to make dev stuff work really kills the magic that nixos is supposed to be :|

        • steersman2484@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, it is a lot of initial work, but once you got your shell.nix or flake.nix in place it is really nice, to not have to deal with different dependencies and versions in different projects.

          But you can also archive the same on any distro with the nix package manager.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            except i want my computer to function for my needs without “a lot of initial work”

            • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s an investment for the next time you install on a new dev machine. After install, I will literally run a single command to return to the exact state of my dev environment.

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The maintainers? Yeah, I completely agree. No one actually likes any of them… as far as I’m aware… typical Linux geeks, my way or the highway.

  • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I couldn’t figure out how to make the wifi on my Debian machine reliable so I replaced the default wifi manager front-end and backend with iwctl, the same thing Arch uses by default. It seems to be working but now I have an unholy abomination of Debian spliced with Arch DNA.

  • sayitghoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t see what the problem is with Arch Linux and why it gets so much flak. I am not a Linux expert by any measure, but I use EndeavourOS and find it really use to use (don’t ask me to install from scratch). Its extremely stable and I like the fact that it gets updated constantly.

    The only other distro I really liked is MX Linux. My main gripe was that I don’t want to reinstall every so many years. I want to set up an OS and just use it without worrying about it being a temporary thing. But maybe I’ll change my mind in the future.

    I’m not for or against any distro really, maybe except Ubuntu and its bloat. I just use what best suits me, which is the whole point of all the different distros.

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yeah, it’s obvious a jealous Manjaro user stole that dude’s sticker…

    Edit: almost forgot… I use arch btw…

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I use mint, btw.

    (…Not really but it fits the joke the best. I have used it and it’s an excellent distro whether you are a beginner or just want something stable and full featured. )

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Mint is such a pragmatic distro. Honestly I admire people who are just happy with their Mint and don’t feel the need to distro hop to ever more esoteric package ecosystems just to feel alive

      • YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The only reason I stopped using mint is some of the programs didn’t exist or were outdated. I’m about to settle at NixOS.

        Edit: I ended up going back to my intermediary between mint and nix: Arch Linux

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I unironically prefer apt over pacman, simply because my monkeybrain got addicted to running pacman -S (that was how to update, right?) and I dropped in productivity. apt is just “nah fam, there’s nothing new for you” most days, which gives me the quiet time I want and need.

        I ran Manjaro BTW. It was nice while it lasted, but Debian is my new friend now.

        • Lunya \ she/it@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The difference here is more between release types, I think. Arch is rolling, so there are updates you can get every few minutes. Debian is a rock, and rocks aren’t known for moving a lot.

          (The command is sudo pacman -Syu btw)

  • FractalsInfinite@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Arch is a pain to setup BTW. It’s worth it, though you’d be better using something like the installer for cachyOS to get the same experience

      • Baleine@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        All my friends with endeavour are clueless when their system eventually breaks because they haven’t done the manual install and so they haven’t read the wiki and they have no idea how to actually repair their system

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I broke my system a few times, but I know what I did. Once I tried to remove mesa and everything it’s a dependency for…not realizing it’s part of the kernel. Another time I messed up my video drivers trying to install Optimus.

          Actually a lot of my breaks can be traced to Nvidia being a shitass about supporting Linux. But I need the proprietary drivers for my editing software

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s absolutely not. Use archinstall. The hardest part is preparing for breakages when you update.

      • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly, I’ve done it so often, it runs automatically. The config stuff I have for years and years, I think I haven’t change shit for ever. Runs.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve used arch on one machine now, am a total noob to it, and I really like it. I see what people are raving about and I see no reason to shit on it. I don’t really care if 6 years ago some people were annoying about it

      • spiderwort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I didn’t really mean it that way. But subconsciously, ya, maybe.

        My friend has that look. Like half-hobbit. And ya, he’s a wizard too.