“ceo of cloud company says employees must work on premise.”

must do wonders for the marketing of the capability of their platform.

you would have received more relevant responses if you had titled your post as, “there is absolutely no evidence that musk is against free speech. what are you folks on about, anyway?”

scanning a random qr code has to be this generation’s plugging in an unknown usb drive.

the optimal approach would be to embrace public transport and let cars go the way of carthorses.

say what you will, but online gambling being the most blocked category is heartening to hear.

the core benefit was in adoption. it was easy to get parents, for example, saying that they jist have to bother with one app for all of their messaging.

the minute they have to contend with sms and signal, they don’t mind adding whatsapp in the mix as well.

sometimes, one thinks, any intelligence for government would be a good idea.

til that tahoma is actually a mountain and not just a font.

can’t wait to see pics of the peak of times new roman, now!

you do know that you are technically dead-naming, right?

thanks to them for making my deredditification that much easier!

I’m a mirror. if you’re nice to me, I’m nice to you. if not, well…

looks like they would need to conduct an actual windows recall, now.

i am ashamed to say that i have driven when drunk. this was over a decade ago and i don’t remember the 13km trip taken late at night.

i am thankful that the car was found intact on inspection the next morning and i hadn’t hit anybody.

but that was the last time i drove drunk. i was a prize idiot to do so–as is anyone else who does so.

as much as one hates whatsapp, the headline is not the most accurate. the article states that it’s not specifically a vulnerability in whatsapp itself that exposes a correlation between a sender of a message and probable recipients.

this is a flaw that can be used regardless of your choice of messaging platform. but, yeah, even if whatsapp itaelf didnt drop the ball in this particular instance, still don’t use it.

we’ve found the early bird.

i get what you’re saying, but the vpn was inactive when the app sent these requests. DDG was active at the time and using the VPN slot.

so it isn’t the vpn functionality, per se, of the app that’s doing anything here.

would you have done this with the ad guard vpn deactivated but the app still running in the background?

I’ve been using the app for a few montha now and it’s only today that it got flagged in the DDG report. it’s not shown up before.