delete

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is plenty of space between absolute trust and its contrapositive.

      • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Why don’t you fork Signal? Then, you’ll know the glowies aren’t funding you.

        Which lines its libre software source code are malicious? Know what libre software is?

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Totally pointless since the chokepoint is Signal’s US-domiciled back-end server, and Signal doesn’t allow you to self-host it.

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              That says nothing about what they actually run on their server, or who they allow to look at their database. Most importantly, you can’t self-host signal anyway, so posting the source code for something you can’t verify that they even run, is pointless. They went a whole year one time without updating that repo, until the open source community made an uproar about it, and signal was forced to start updating it again.

            • davel@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Reason: Disinformation

              I don’t think you’re aware of who wrote Lemmy any more than you were aware of who admins lemmy.ml.

              • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Worse, both of you should know better! See its software license cited above.

                Spreading funding FUD tells us nothing about whether its license or source code is malicous, just makes people apathetic to privacy.