• pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    86·
    4 months ago

    It took me a few seconds to realise that graph is y=x*86-64.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      23·
      4 months ago

      Subtle shade, I like it

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      4 months ago

      I would have expected a graph within the interval 86-64 (or flipped I suppose). Now it makes sense again.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    532·
    4 months ago

    btw ARM Holdings stocks have entered what I consider the affordable range, since Trump is tanking the US economy. Still RISCy. Just sayan.

    • Smee@poeng.link
      6·
      4 months ago

      I’ve never tried RISC-V but I still need my fix!

    • mlg@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      4 months ago

      Don’t worry, in a few years China will release some comparable and powerful RISC-V processors with some brand new in house fabs.

      Although by that point it’ll probably have 300% tariff, so probably stick to TSMC x86 and ARM anyway lol

  • lalala@lemmy.world
    121·
    4 months ago

    x86 was supposed to be obsolete 30 years ago.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    5·
    4 months ago

    It’d be cool to learn about the machining of a processor but it’s unfortunately out of my reach

  • Aqarius@lemmy.world
    21·
    4 months ago

    VS? Wasn’t x86-64 originally an ARM creation?

    • excral@feddit.org
      14·
      4 months ago

      No, it was an AMD creation. Intel created their Itanium 64 bit architecture but it failed and died out completely