• DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
    1210·
    1 year ago

    You’re right, broader compatibility and being more user-friendly serves no use to anyone

    • JackRiddle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      148·
      1 year ago

      Linux is compatible with almost all windows software now, and windows is absolutely not more user friendly, it’s just what you’re used to.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        I guess some of us are more astute when it comes to the difference between clicking something and needing to open a terminal and remember strings of commands before. Oh, and being intrinsically familiar with a forum.

        • JackRiddle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          For a lot of distro’s you don’t need to use a terminal to install things if you aren’t comfortable with that. While I believe learning to use a commandline a little bit will always be beneficial, you really don’t havo to. Take a look at linux mint for example, which has a “store” for packages.

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            When I used Mint, I found I’d typically get outdated versions when downloading software from the “store”, sometimes to the extent that it outright wouldn’t work. It was because of that I found myself needing to learn to use Terminal.

      • LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        613·
        1 year ago

        Install windows software: download the exe or msi and click OK 2 or 3 times

        Install Linux software: you got at least 40hrs to learn terminal commands to install dependencies n shit? I fucking don’t, that’s not what user-friendly looks like to 90% of the planet

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          82·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much everything is available in a package manager, flatpaks, etc.

          If you’re at the point of building from source, I don’t think you’re in regular user territory to start with.

        • JackRiddle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          138·
          1 year ago

          It’s clear you haven’t used linux.

          Windows: open edge, go to google, type the package you want, scroll past ads, download random executable from internet, execute, click through wizard, open program.

          Linux: open package manager, search package you want, click install, open program.

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
            3·
            1 year ago

            You seem rather fixated on Edge, unlike anyone who’s ever used Windows.

          • catloaf@lemm.eeBanned from communityEnglish
            21·
            1 year ago

            Windows has winget now. It’s great.

          • LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            66·
            1 year ago

            I have, quite a bit: Ubuntu, Red Hat, Mint, Debian. Not everything is in your precious package manager

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.networkEnglish
            23·
            1 year ago

            And once you’ve done it once, you can install it again on another machine by just using

            Linux: $PACKAGE_MANAGER install $PACKAGE, open program.

            Windows: open edge, go to google, type the package you want, scroll past ads, download random executable from internet, execute, click through wizard, open program.

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.socialBannedEnglish
          01·
          1 year ago

          commands to install dependencies n shit

          That only happens if you are fixated on installing the software without connecting to the internet.
          Otherwise, the package manager does it for you (that’s what its job is)

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.networkEnglish
      52·
      1 year ago

      Thought you were talking about Linux at first.

      I use both Windows, Linux, and macOS - my opinion is that Windows is the least user-friendly of the bunch.

            • hedgehog@ttrpg.networkEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              Should I apologize for hurting your feelings by suggesting that Windows is bad?

              • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
                1·
                1 year ago

                It’d be pretty stupid to get any amount of upset over someone having an opinion. Factual inaccuracies are something else though.

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.socialBannedEnglish
          01·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like something an apple exec might say… For their products.

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            Nah. An Apple exec would outright tell you you’re using it wrong despite knowing of an inherent flaw in the design and offer to sell you a new one for even more money.

    • YourPrivatHater@ani.socialEnglish
      89·
      1 year ago

      😂 User friendly windows… Tell that to your grandma when win 7 was around.

      Oh and Linux is actually more compatible, you just need to work on it some times. Wich is great against cyber threats.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.caEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        Just need to work on it, huh? Oddly, that something I almost never need to do with Windows unless I’m doing something extremely niche.

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.socialBannedEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          something extremely niche

          Desktop Linux is already pretty niche.

        • YourPrivatHater@ani.socialEnglish
          14·
          1 year ago

          I’ve done more tinkering in windows than Linux over the time. Especially for older software. Also Windows breaks more often itself.