You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.
I think I’m good 👍
You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.
I think I’m good 👍
Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?
They’re probably just using CGNAT.
noting that Adobe’s terms for licensing content are typical for every cloud content company
Adobe, you’re not a cloud content company. You’re a software company.
Nice 😎 Sounds like someone needs to file a complaint with the Privacy Commissioner!
Or email them to ask about it THEN complain and attach their email for extra style point!
I believe that where I live the license plate numbers would also not be considered personal information. This might work here too, if a different exemption was not claimed, although I’m not aware of anyone using this technology near me.
The server must have to send some metadata to the client telling when it’s running an ad because there are other things that need to happen client side during that like adjusting of the time or making the ad clickable
True, and they do use normal surveillance cameras too. Personally I am interested in facial recognition systems as I’ve seen the back-end of facial recognition systems in other retailers and it was incredibly creepy. They may not actually be keeping track of card #s the same way other stores do*, the biggest red flag in the statement to me is it doesn’t rule out more general demographics tracking tech, which is something I don’t think is covered by the legislation. There may be a little bit of a language barrier in this exchange as well. But I think most people aren’t very aware of even what privacy laws exist, compared to eg. the GDPR which is quite common to hear about online.
*(I want to try something similar for Mark’s since they can be seen tracking card #s in a very overt way.)
Imagine not having all your system settings in plain text files 😬
I have used Windows since I was a child and I still need “documentation” to do routine things, because they hide stuff 8 levels deep inside an obscure settings window that requires an arcane ritual to access.
I right click in nautilus to open the properties window and check the checkbox :)
new sudo vulnerabilities? how exciting!
E: read the article, I guess that is part of the reason for the proposal. interesting
deleted by creator
Your browser can block cookies.
Debian also doesn’t come with a GUI package manager as far as I’m aware.
Of course it has one.
They pulled a corporate and rewrote an opensource project to embed it into windows
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Do you really need to license your comments?
© 2024 [email protected] - All Rights Reserved
(Plz don’t sue me for making a derivative work based your comment and violating the license kthxbai)
So someone forked the GitHub right?
As long as you’re willing and able to follow through with it if needed.
A better approach might be to ask them to fix it without the ultimatum first
I don’t know about getting worse but it definitely has trouble in my area with some businesses/ parking lots and how to get in to them