Surveillance creep is once again striking in the age verification debate. This is happening at the FCC this time.

  • sevenoverthree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The cost of living in this world is simply resources paid into the arms race.

    For me, I focus on what I want out of my tech services. Learn to build and learn to maintain. There will be ways to mask, spoof and anonymize.

    And for sure, although it won’t be today, there will be legislators who move against this trend. This is, and always has been, a matter of legislation. Separation from church and state is now separation of tech and state.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Also I know we all reasonably hate cryptocurrencies but you will for sure be able to use Monero to buy prepaid phones even after it’s illegal, seeing as you can use it to buy illegal guns and drugs now lol

      So if it’s just illegal from the seller’s perspective and not illegal to possess, it’d be a pretty easy law to circumvent.

      Still, that won’t help the domestic abuse victims and all other people who need burners and aren’t tech savvy.

  • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I emaoled my congresswoman about this. I told her not to support it and why; but more importantly, I told her that anyone with the technical acumen will simply not comply with this law.

    That’s the hidden cost of what orange Shitler has unleashed, the debasement of our public institutions. How powerful is a government that is ignored by its constituents?

  • Comet79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I am in the EU and after 2027 freedom of speech in big websites will be pretty much over. What measures can i take to protect myself from government censorship other than using decentralized websites like Lemmy?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The author gives the situation benefit of the doubt that it does not deserve. It is not “mutating” or “creeping;” the ABSOLUTELY INTENTIONAL, ORIGINAL PURPOSE is simply now becoming more and more obvious, even to the people who desperately want to pretend it isn’t happening.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh look, another attack on the freedom of speech that anonymity allows. Here’s hoping “The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.” - John Gilmore

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m not defending this shit, I’m of course against it, but a true freedom of speech means you should not need to worry about hiding your identity when saying what you think. The law supposed to protect you from any repercussions from the government.

      The fact that we do, means that perhaps freedom of speech was taken from us much earlier than that.

      • binux@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The law of the government was supposed to protect us from the government… Something tells me that was never going to work in the long term.

        • elephantium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That theory pretty much only works for a limited government with a clear separation of powers and some actual accountability.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Quite right, there’s a scale of freedom of speech and the world is sliding down. The independent media, like newspapers with real journalists went first to the media barons like Murdoch, then we got the internet and some independence returned, along with an anonymous voice for the masses, then facebook et.al. corrupted that independence and controlled the voice with algorithms and network effects, and now this. All downhill.